This is simply the same as sissy except for the roles. whereas sissy is FemDom, this is for a Daddy-Little and the "Little" is usually female but can be a gay maile relationship
This fails the ALG test for the same reason that Sissy does. In the first place any relationship where "daddy" has anything to do with the little girl's underthings or like that is totally out of bounds. Before the middle 1970's, in real life, that would have been viewed as having implications of Pedophilia. During the first 7 years of a child's life, the mother was primary and Daddy had NO PLACE in the nursery, so changing Little Girl's diaper was pretty much out of the question. There is a banner ad for Fetware that shows a girl laying down with her panties showing that says "Daddy puts me in plastic pants". That is so self-consciously Fetish that it is beyond belief for anyone born before 1970. A girl leanred to change a doll when she was 7 or 8, a boy NEVER learend that skill during the era when rubber panties where the going thing so it fails the AUTHETICITY test. Second, the emphasis is not on the Little but on the "dominant" so it fails the Primacy test: ALG is about the Little Girl
Like Sissy, DDLG only uses the LG things as accessories to a fully sexual agenda that is NOT ALG. For the ALG, it is the Little Girl things and way of being that are the important things in and of themselves, not as props for some other agenda. Being little girlish IS the agenda for her. DDLG has another agenda that, like Sissy, is just not part of RUFFLES & RIBBONS GIRLS' HOME which is All about being Little GIRLS